backd: Litepaper


Over-collateralization is one of the most critical pillars of DeFi. The pseudonymous nature of Ethereum requires agents to over-collateralize loans as a means to protect the loan issuer (lending protocols) from suffering losses in case the loan is defaulted on. However, high volatility in cryptoasset prices requires over-collateralized loans to be further secured via a liquidation mechanism. Liquidations protect lenders from suffering losses in case the collateral to debt ratio falls below some threshold, at which a borrower’s collateral is seized and sold off at a discount to repay the borrower’s debt. While from a lending protocol’s point of view, liquidations allow the protocol to remain over-collateralized as a whole, borrowers suffer from penalty fees incurred through collateral auctions. In the end, it is the borrower’s responsibility to ensure that the ratio of the value of the locked collateral to the value of the borrowed funds remains sufficiently high. However, depositing excess collateral bears a trade-off. While a higher collateral to debt ratio reduces liquidation risk, it comes at an opportunity cost of being unable to be employed for interest generating purposes elsewhere.

In a perfect world for borrowers, lending protocols would accept various interest-bearing LP tokens as collateral. Imagine being able to use 3CRV, aDAI, yCRV, as well as much lesser known and less liquid LP tokens to borrow against. While this would be great for a borrower, it is extremely risky for lending protocols, especially for less known and illiquid LP tokens. An LP token of a new protocol offering very lucrative APYs cannot be used as collateral due to the risk of the LP token becoming worthless. Recall that the collateral risk is taken on by the lending protocol, not the borrower. Hence, borrowers are left with the task of balancing liquidation risk by maintaining higher levels of excess collateral and allocating funds to other interest earning opportunities. Imagine if borrowers could lower their excess collateral amounts, earn interest on other protocols and not lose the protection against getting liquidated, all while lending protocols are completely shielded from any additional risk.

In this paper, we introduce backd, an Ethereum-based protocol that annihilates the aforementioned opportunity cost of depositing excess collateral by offering interest earning liquidation protection. The backd protocol can be used by any liquidity provider (LP) to earn interest on deposits via yield-farming strategies. Furthermore, LPs can register their funds as “back up collateral” for other protocols but farm yield and earn interest until funds are actually needed for collateral top ups.

A Different Type of Yield Farm

The backd protocol is in some sense similar to typical yield farming protocols, as it also employs yield farming strategies to generate interest for LPs. However, unlike existing yield farming protocols, backd allows LPs to use their holdings as back up collateral on other protocols, such as Aave or Compound. This serves a single purpose: LPs with over-collateralized loans on supported protocols can earn higher interest on their collateral through backd, while not increasing their liquidation risk. For example, a backd LP that has a loan from Compound can register his Compound position to be topped up with his backd deposits. Thereby, an LP is able to earn backd APYs until the funds are needed to increase his collateral for liquidation protection.

Let’s look at how LPs earn interest on backd and how deposits on backd may be utilized as back up collateral.

Earnings for LPs

In order to understand backd, it is important to understand how LPs earn interest. The backd protocol utilizes single-asset crypto pools, into which any liquidity provider may deposit the pool’s underlying asset in exchange for pool-specific LP tokens. The pool deposits are allocated to a pool-specific vault before being employed to a yield-farming strategy. Strategy profits can be harvested and are shared between the LPs of a pool, as well as the strategist. Furthermore, LPs earn fees from collateral top ups that other LPs may pay for as part of the liquidation protection that backd offers. All generated earnings compound as unrealized interest from a strategy is retained by the pool (i.e., the total underlying appreciates over the total supply of a pool’s LP tokens). Furthermore, LPs receive protocol-specific rewards on a per block basis for the liquidity they’ve provided and will be able to participate in backd governance.

Liquidation Protection

backd offers functionality that allows LPs to use their deposits as back up collateral for other (supported) protocols. For instance, an LP that has borrowed funds from Compound and Aave can register his positions for liquidation protection. Thereby part of the LPs backd deposits will be automatically used as back up collateral should his collateral to debt ratio on the registered protocols fall below some threshold. When registering a position an LP has to specify (i) the address (e.g. his address) to register, (ii) the name of the protocol, as well as (iii) the health factor at which a collateral top up should occur. Furthermore, one has to specify the (iv) incremental and (v) total top up amounts. Once a position has been successfully registered, it may be incrementally topped up once its health factor drops below the specified threshold. For example, an LP may register his collateral on Compound to be topped up by increments of 1000 DAI each time his Compound health factor falls below 1.05 for a maximum top up total of 5000 DAI.

The backd Top Up Mechanism

Perhaps one of the biggest questions at this point is: how do collateral top ups work? As previously explained, health factors need to be monitored across protocols in order to determine whether registered positions are eligible for top up. This task is computationally infeasible to be performed on-chain and thus backd relies on so-called backd keepers, external agents that report eligible top up positions to the backd smart contract. Anyone may act as a backd keeper and monitor health factors across protocols for registered backd positions. For efficiency requirements, this is will have to be an automated process. Similar to how liquidation bots, backd incentivizes the creation of top up bots. Keepers which report borrowers for top ups successfully receive a percentage fee charged on the top up amount, while they also get reimbursed for the gas cost. An additional fee charged on the top up amount is shared between the LPs of the pool.

Note that as LPs specify the health factor at which collateral top ups occur, they are incentivized to set a factor that lies above the protocol’s liquidation threshold in order to avoid bidding wars between both liquidation and top up bots. Nonetheless, priority gas auctions may occur between backd keepers for top ups.

Collateral top ups

Collateral top ups occur in incremental amounts specified by the LP when the top up position is first registered. Incremental top ups may occur as long as the total top up amount is greater or equal to the single top up amount and as long as the position to be topped up is indeed eligible.

Supported Protocols

On backd v1, LPs may use deposits as back up collateral on Aave and Compound. However, this can easily be extended via backd governance in the future. To add support for a new protocol, all it takes is to implement, deploy and add a new protocol handler which contains the logic for measuring the health factor of a position and for depositing funds as collateral.


When a position is topped up, a fixed percentage fee is charged on the top up amount and distributed among the LPs of the pool in which the position was registered.


The backd protocol consists of several key components, perhaps most notably liquidity pools, vaults and strategies. Let’s briefly examine each of these in a bit more detail:

For backd v1, strategies and vaults are unique to a liquidity pool and therefore pools exist in isolation of one another. For a more technical overview of each backd component check out the official docs.

Understanding Liquidity Pools

Liquidity pools on backd differ in several ways from one another.


The backd protocol will rely on a decentralized governance scheme, which will be introduced shortly after the launch of backd v1. The protocol offers a lot of room for parameterization, such as required reserve ratios for pools, strategy allocation weights, reserve requirement weights for vaults or LP and keeper fees. Furthermore, new pools and strategies can be added via governance. This allows other DeFi protocols to propose a strategy (or pool), which allocates liquidity to their protocol. Ultimately, this enables LPs to use existing yield-farming protocols, while also benefitting from the option to use their holdings as back up collateral through backd.

Disclaimer: there will not be a governance token sale, so please do not fall for scams.


For backd v1, we implement three core pools, namely for DAI, USDC and ETH. Hence, any LP can earn interest from depositing any of these assets, as well as use their pool holdings as back up collateral on Aave or Compound. The v1 core pools’ strategies are built upon Curve for earning interest and will be subject to backd getting whitelisted by the Curve DAO.

Shortly after the v1 launch, backd governance will be released, which will introduce a range of new incentives for backd LPs. This will empower LPs to vote on the addition of new pools and strategies, as well as make important parameter changes for the protocol (e.g. adjust the risk level of a pool).

As backd sits in a position between topping up collateral on other protocols and investing funds for high returns, future strategies should be designed to integrate other DeFi protocols. We encourage Furthermore, liquidation protection can easily go beyond lending protocols to other over-collateralized positions, such as Maker vaults.